Private money interests at the heart of Hong Kong protests

  • August 27, 2019
Private money interests at the heart of Hong Kong protests

Another round of resistance was recorded over the weekend between protesters in Hong Kong and the Chinese government. Organisers of the previous Sunday’s pro-democracy rally estimated that 1.7 million Hong Kongers poured into city streets. Much of the news commentary depicts a David vs. Goliath standoff in which Hong Kong can only lose.

Yet this view overlooks an important aspect of the power relationship between Hong Kong and China: private money. Rich Chinese mainlanders – many of whom are intimately connected to the ruling Communist Party – stand to lose a lot of money if Hong Kong descends into chaos. My research on offshore finance and state power helps explain why.

Hong Kong plays a crucial role for private wealth

Hong Kong has long been a top global finance centre – though China has been advancing the development of Shanghai to challenge that role. Eswar Prasad, a China expert and economics professor at Cornell University, concludes that the rapid expansion of China’s economy and markets means Beijing no longer needs Hong Kong. The Hong Kong protests, it follows, will not bring the giant to its knees.

However, Hong Kong still plays an essential role in protecting the wealth of private individuals. They may plausibly fear that Beijing will confiscate any of their wealth held on the mainland if they lose political favour. After all, the state controls the Chinese legal system. Hong Kong, in contrast, has an independent judiciary, providing a greater degree of safety for Chinese private wealth.

So how much wealth is hidden in Hong Kong?

Ordinary people think about money as cash in their pockets, or bank deposits. The wealthy – in Hong Kong or elsewhere – are more likely to have their money tied up in equity, bonds or other assets held in financial institutions around the world.

With its favourable tax laws, lax regulations and opaque financial services, Hong Kong attracts a lot of this wealth. According to the Financial Secrecy Index, Hong Kong is among the world’s most secretive jurisdictions. Consequently, it is difficult to know precisely how much private money is hoarded in Hong Kong. Yet, anecdotal evidence gives us an idea of how much is stashed there and who owns it.

The Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), a regulatory body, published a survey last year covering the semi-autonomous territory’s asset and wealth management industry. The survey counts assets worth $3.1 trillion (all figures in US dollars) under the management of Hong Kong’s financial firms. Compare this amount with the $8.1 trillion of overall cross-border transactions reported by Hong Kong banks to the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) and you get an idea of just how vital the wealth management business is.

The survey also finds that $553 billion of the $3.1 trillion in assets are held in trusts. A trust is a legal construct that allows the owner of something, say shares in a company, to give away these shares to the benefit of another person without making her the new owner of the shares. That makes it difficult for outsiders to trace the wealth back to its true owner. These traits make trusts incredibly useful tools to fend off the nosy, the taxman or claims from creditors and thereby to build up capital more quickly, as sociologist Brooke Harrington argues in her latest book.

Interestingly, the financial firms that responded to the SFC’s survey reported the location of the settlors – the person or entity that set up the trust. These results suggest that Hong Kong and Chinese sources account for $331 billion – nearly 60 percent of the $553 billion held in Hong Kong trusts.

For comparison, this means that rich people from Hong Kong and China hold about the equivalent of the archipelago’s annual GDP in trusts alone.

This doesn’t include other money that goes unreported because it’s dirty – for instance, the proceeds from corruption. The 2016 Panama Papers leak revealed that some of China’s politically and economically influential families owned offshore structures. Mossack Fonseca, the law firm at the core of the scandal, set up more than 16,300 shell companies for these individuals in Hong Kong alone. Again, this suggests that China’s elite is heavily invested in Hong Kong – and in its future.

Chinese elites face a dilemma

But here’s the big problem: Hong Kong’s offshore set-up works only under the “one country, two systems” approach. What makes Hong Kong uniquely useful for the Chinese elites is that it combines political control with separate legal and monetary systems. Rich Chinese can open trusts on the mainland, too, but the firms setting them up are mostly state-owned or government-controlled, which means the money is not in a true haven.

Hong Kong, in contrast, retained an independent judiciary based on British common-law tradition. International lawyers I interviewed for my research pointed out that British commercial law is the most developed and predictable legal system for financial affairs. In addition, Hong Kong has a separate currency – the Hong Kong dollar, so that the mainland’s capital controls are not an issue, as they are in Shanghai.

Singapore, Hong Kong’s closest competitor as an Asian offshore financial centre, isn’t integrated into the Chinese economic system. For wealthy Chinese, Hong Kong has a unique set-up that cannot be easily replaced by moving assets elsewhere.

As an organised entity, the Chinese party state might no longer need Hong Kong to spur China’s economic development. This shift may allow Beijing to respond harshly to the Hong Kong protests. However, China’s rich and powerful elites, who make up the party state, have more complicated interests. A violent crackdown on Hong Kong and the ensuing collapse of the delicate balance between independence and control would damage their own prosperity.

*Andrea Binder [2014] is a Gates Cambridge Scholar, who has just completed a PhD in Politics and International Studies. She is also a nonresident fellow at the Global Public Policy Institute in Berlin. You can follow her on twitter @abinder1. This article was originally published as Why China’s wealthy elites have so much at stake in Hong Kong in The Monkey Cage at The Washington Post on 21st August. Reprinted with permission." Picture credit: Wikimedia Commons. 20190714 Hong Kong Shatin anti-extradition bill protest. Author: Studio Incendo.

Andrea Binder

Andrea Binder

  • Alumni
  • Germany
  • 2014 PhD Politics and International Studies
  • Magdalene College

For the past eight years I worked at the Global Public Policy Institute (GPPi), an independent think tank based in Berlin. From 2011-2014, I served as GPPi’s associate director heading the programs on humanitarian action and innovation in development. I conducted field research in Haiti, DRC, CAR, Uganda and Turkey. At Cambridge, I will focus on state power and the politics of offshore finance. Offshore financial centres, or tax havens, are at the core of social inequality within and across countries. They help the wealthy elite to avoid taxes, shifting the burden of paying for public goods to lower income classes. Global tax evasion can only be addressed if countries collaborate internationally because of the near-complete integration of financial markets into one single global market. Studying the regulation of tax havens, I hope to make a contribution to more tax justice and a more stable financial system.

Latest Blogs

How Cambridge Analytica influenced Nigeria’s elections

My research broadly tackles questions of technology, equity, and accountability within the Global South. I emphasise the West’s use of sub-Saharan Africa as a testing ground or laboratory for its nascent technologies before launching them in the West. This blog is an excerpt from my recent presentation at the 2022 Gates Day of Research, titled […]

Why algorithms are necessarily value-laden

Algorithmic decision-making systems applied in social contexts drape value-laden solutions in an illusory veil of objectivity. Machine learning plays an increasingly prominent role in mediating institutional decisions in everything from corporate hiring practices to criminal sentencing. This ongoing AI spring has invigorated discussions of the ethical dimensions of these techno-social arrangements. In particular, there is […]

Preparing for all scenarios in an unstable world

On March 9th, Mohamed A. El-Erian joined the Gates Cambridge community for a virtual fireside chat, where he discussed decision-making in conditions of uncertainty, the economic impact of the pandemic and relief efforts and the importance of diversity of thought and scenario planning. El-Erian is President of Queens’ College, Cambridge and Chief Economic Advisor of […]

How can the international community help Belarus?

Last Sunday represented a tipping point in the recent history of Belarus which has had an immediate effect on the lives of its citizens, including mine. Independent exit polls and observers representing the diplomatic community, verified by the crowdsourcing platform Golos, show that, had it been a fair and transparent election, the uninterrupted, 26-year-long reign […]