Scholar working on Supreme Court case

  • October 13, 2025
Scholar working on Supreme Court case

Atticus DeProspo is representing a case coming before the US Supreme Court this week.

A Gates Cambridge Scholar is working on a case involving the retroactive application of a law on restitution payments which comes before the US Supreme Court this week.

Atticus DeProspo [2016], who did his MPhil in Criminology, is representing Holsey Ellinburg Jr, who was sentenced to nearly 27 years in prison for his role in a bank robbery in Georgia in December 1995. 

Under the federal law at the time of the robbery, Ellingburg had to make restitution payments for 20 years until 2016. However, in 1996 Congress brought in a new law – the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act – that extends defendants’ liability until the later of two dates: 20 years after sentencing or when they are released from prison. The law also requires defendants to pay interest on the restitution. 

After 2016, the government continued to try to collect restitution from Ellingburg – including after he was released from prison. 

Ellingburg went to court, arguing that he should not have had to pay restitution after November 2016 and that the 1996 law violated the US Constitution, which contains an Ex Post Facto Clause. That prohibits laws that retroactively increase the punishment for a crime or criminalise conduct that was legal when it occurred. Ellingburg’s case centres around whether the Ex Post Facto Clause only applies to criminal law.

Atticus was appointed pro bono in autumn 2023 to represent Ellingburg at the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. The Eighth Circuit ruled against Ellingburg on the grounds that restitution is a civil remedy, and Atticus’ firm applied for a re-hearing, which was turned down. 

Next, his firm, Williams & Connolly LLP, filed a petition at the Supreme Court, which was opposed by the federal government but granted by the Supreme Court in April 2025. The federal government then took the rare step of supporting Williams & Connolly’s position so the Supreme Court had to appoint an amicus brief to oppose the petition. The Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Ellingburg’s behalf tomorrow [14th October].

*Photo by Tim Mossholder on Unsplash

Latest News

Scholar wins Adventure Travel Award for his book

A Gates Cambridge Scholar has won a prestigious prize for his book on his travels in Alaska at the Banff Mountain Film and Book Festival. Ben Weissenbach’s book North to the […]

Monkey whisperer

Nurul Huda Aslari Effendy [2026] – or Huda – is a monkey whisperer. She grew up with monkeys snatching food from her garden and spent long hours watching them on […]

Scholar co-chairs migration history conference

Experts from around the world gathered in Cambridge last week for a conference on the history of the distinction between the categories of refugee and migrant. The Fung Global Fellows […]

The Gates Cambridge conversation: How can we improve people’s diet?

What works when it comes to reducing people’s intake of sugary drinks and junk food? Miriam Alvarado and Élisabeth Demers-Potvin both work on the evaluation of health prevention policies in […]