Carbon conflicts and forest landscapes

  • November 24, 2015
Carbon conflicts and forest landscapes

Albert Arhin has contributed a chapter to a new book on carbon forestry projects in Africa.

I call for carbon projects to not only consider past interventions, but also place issues of social justice, equity, livelihood benefits and sustainable development ideals at the heart and centre of their implementation.

Albert Arhin

A Gates Cambridge Scholar has contributed to a new book that examines the management of forests and carbon in Africa.

Albert Arhin has contributed a chapter to the book, Carbon Conflicts and Forest Landscapes in Africa, edited by Melissa Leach and Ian Scoones. The book examines what happens on the ground when carbon forestry projects – existing in various guises, often under the umbrella of the Reduced Emissions for Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) programme – arrive in national and local contexts.

Through a series of detailed case studies from seven countries, from east, west and southern Africa, the chapters ask what happens when carbon forestry projects unfold in particular places: who wins, and who loses out, and what the consequences are – for carbon sequestration and offsetting, as well as poverty reduction.

Albert [2012], who is doing a PhD in Geography, has written a chapter which provides an overview of the different types of forest carbon mechanisms in which African projects and programmes participate and shows how forestry carbon projects have become vital components of current thinking on global environmental governance and management of natural resources.

He argues that forest carbon projects are institutional frameworks within which national governments, the private sector, the NGO sector, philanthropists and researchers all hold different interests, roles and levels of participation and power. He says local communities have had only a marginal influence and position in the whole carbon policy web and that much of the discussion about projects is inaccessible to local people and not just marginalises but excludes communities from meaningfully engaging in the process.

‘I call for carbon projects to not only consider past interventions, but also place issues of social justice, equity, livelihood benefits and sustainable development ideals at the heart and centre of their implementation,’ he says.

The book is published just before governments across the world convene in Paris for the 21st Conference of the Parties (COP21) to agree on a new global climate change deal. The expected agreement covering both developed and developing countries will serve as the starting point for a longer-term effort to prevent global temperatures from rising above 2°C.

Deforestation and land degradation contribute to over a fifth of carbon emissions. Within this context, carbon offset approaches are increasingly being advocated as an essential post-COP 21 strategy to mitigate climate change. In such schemes carbon emissions in one part of the world (usually the industrialised north) are offset by initiatives that reduce emissions in another part of the world where there are plentiful forests and opportunities for new carbon sequestration (such as Africa). Such projects can, it is argued, mitigate climate, reduce poverty and protect biodiversity protection, thus creating a ‘win-win’ scenario.

The book draws attention to the fact that carbon projects do not arrive on a blank slate. All sites have long histories of intervention, including a whole array of forestry, environmental protection and development projects. In Sierra Leone, the carbon project to protect the Western Area Peninsula Forest (WAPFoR) is taking place in a context where the forest reserve (i.e. WAPFoR) has been successively used as: farming and settlement sites for pre-colonial Temne and Shebro populations; sources of European shipbuilding timber; protectors of watersheds and water supplies; a place of timber and non-timber resources for local livelihoods and a safe haven for internally displaced people and refugees and now a site for carbon projects. Those contributing to the book contend that these past interventions have shaped and reshaped livelihoods and landscapes and generated experiences and memories that influence local responses to new interventions.

The book further argues that a new politics of access and control over forests and their carbon is emerging, making the noble aims of climate mitigation through carbon forestry very challenging. For instance, in Ghana hunters and charcoal burners have been excluded from areas under carbon forestry, which undermines their long-standing livelihood options. Conflicts between local people and state officials, between local people and project proponents and even between project proponents and state officials are recurring themes reported by many of the case studies.

The book identifies the need to address conflicts head on and to develop a more politically sophisticated approach to carbon governance in complex landscapes.

Picture credit: By E K Amankwah (Own work) [CC BY-SA 3.0], via Wikimedia Commons.

Latest News

Cambridge event for new book by leading thinkers

Artificial intelligence gets a lot of bad press, but if harnessed correctly has the ability to create jobs and drive growth through enhancing productivity and helping countries level up, according to a new book by some of the world’s leading thinkers. The book, Permacrisis: A Plan to Fix a Fractured World, explores pressing global issues […]

Rainforest carbon credit schemes less effective than thought, claims report

The effectiveness of widely used rainforest carbon credit schemes has been called into question by a new study. The study, Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) Carbon Crediting,  by the Berkeley Carbon Trading Project is co-authored by Gates Cambridge Scholar Libby Blanchard [2012] and has been making headlines around the world. It brings […]

Gates Cambridge Trust seeks Global Engagement Officer

About us  Gates Cambridge Scholarships are prestigious, highly competitive, full-cost scholarships awarded to outstanding applicants from countries outside the UK to pursue a full-time postgraduate degree in any subject available at the University of Cambridge. Gates Cambridge Scholars become part of a lifelong global community defined by its core value of commitment to improving the […]

How combining clinical data could improve traumatic brain injury outcomes

Researchers, led by a Gates Cambridge Scholar, have integrated all medical data collected from traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients to calculate, for the first time, the personalised contribution of each clinical event to long-term recovery. This international effort marks a step towards patient-centred treatment in the intensive care unit (ICU). Shubhayu Bhattacharyay [2020] is the lead […]