First map of oil palm sustainability interventions

  • July 28, 2022
First map of oil palm sustainability interventions

A new study reviews interventions in oil palm management to see which is better for long term sustainability.

These studies will provide further information on differences in local ecology and the effectiveness of interventions in different global regions.

Megan Popkin, Valentine Reiss-Woolever et al

Oil palm expansion is known for its severe environmental impacts, but are there ways to mitigate its harm in order to reap the most from its benefits?

A new study in PLOS Sustainability and Transformation this week presents a review of oil palm management strategies that might support more sustainable cultivation and is the first extensive systematic map of within-plantation oil palm management to directly link environmental outcomes and interventions to sustainability criteria.

The study is co-authored by Gates Cambridge scholars Megan Popkin [2020] and Valentine Reiss-Woolever [2019], who are both doing their PhDs in Zoology,  and  by Dr Edgar C. Turner from the Department of Zoology at the University of Cambridge and Dr Sarah H. Luke, Assistant Professor in Environmental Sciences at the University of Nottingham.

Despite its environmental impact, oil palm has many advantages: it has the highest yield per hectare of any vegetable oil crop and has a higher potential than many other crops to support high complexity habitats with minimal chemical input and relatively high levels of biodiversity and ecosystem functioning.

The new study maps all available evidence assessing within-plantation oil palm management practices at the cultivation stage, with a focus on practices that affect biodiversity and environmental processes.

Using approaches adapted from systematic review protocols, it catalogues oil palm management publications to provide details of geographic location, year, interventions [ie agricultural practices], targeted outcomes of these practices, co-occurrences between different practices and outcomes and study design.

It found that most studies were conducted in Southeast Asia, with fewer studies conducted in South America or Africa. Twenty-six different interventions were found across six categories: soil, understory, within-crop, landscape-level, replanting and mixed/multiple interventions. The most common interventions that were tested were landscape-scale interventions, such as maintaining forest fragments/buffer zones, whereas interventions involved in replanting were the least researched.

Eight outcomes were considered: soil fertility, soil erosion, water quality and availability, pest control, replanting, maintenance of biodiversity and areas of high conservation value and reducing air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions.

Studies researching biodiversity were the most common, whereas comparatively few studies considered replanting and reducing emissions.

The researchers found that most primary studies were observational, with experimental studies being less common, especially in biodiversity research. The findings were matched to the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil’s environmental sustainability criteria to illustrate how policymakers and producers could use the map to access evidence supporting cultivation-stage oil palm sustainability management. The researchers hope their study provides valuable information to inform best management practices and direction for necessary future research.

They state: “These studies will provide further information on differences in local ecology and the effectiveness of interventions in different global regions. We also encourage future investigation of the current evidence base on potential management options to foster increased social sustainability, as well as similar investigations to increase the understanding of interactions between environmental and social factors towards developing more-sustainable oil palm management practices.”

*Picture credit: View of palm oil plantation in Cigudeg, Bogor by Achmad Rabin Taim from Jakarta, Indonesia, courtesy of Wikimedia commons.

Latest News

Why technology needs feminism

What is good technology? Is ‘good’ technology even possible? And how can feminism contribute towards it? Those questions and more are at the heart of a new book co-edited by Gates Cambridge Scholar Dr Kerry McInerney and based on the popular podcast series she co-hosts. The Good Robot: Why technology needs feminism gathers together the thoughts of leading […]

‘Knowledge alone isn’t enough’

The summer before starting his PhD at the University of Cambridge, Rob Henderson was working up a book proposal with his literary agent. That book, Troubled, is published next month by Simon & Schuster and is part memoir, part social commentary.  In it Rob recounts his life growing up in foster care and his time […]

Connecting climate change and mental health

A Gates Cambridge Scholar is organising a webinar to publicise the formal launch of a public, online information hub on the intersection between climate change and mental health. Colleen Rollins [2017], editorial and project manager at the Climate Psychiatry Alliance, is working on the Ecopsychepedia (“EcoPsy”) project which will be the subject of a webinar […]

Reconnecting through music

When José Izquierdo [2013] was working on his PhD at Cambridge on how Latin American composers united European and local influences in the 19th century, he found a way to make his academic work come to life. Much of the music he was researching had never been heard before and he was also discovering old scores […]