The nine actions necessary for successful ecological restoration

  • August 19, 2022
The nine actions necessary for successful ecological restoration

Michael Pashkevich is first author of a paper on what works when it comes to ecological restoration work.

The current UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration offers unprecedented attention, research funding, and capacity to support restoration initiatives, aiming to inspire a large-scale, cross-cultural movement for global ecological restoration.

Michael Pashkevich et al

Researchers have developed a set of nine broad-based actions to guide ecological restoration to the benefit of both nature and wider society.

The nine actions are outlined in a recent studypublished in the journal Trends in Ecology & Evolution. First author is Gates Cambridge Scholar Michael Pashkevich [2017], who did his PhD in Zoology.

The study draws on case studies in tropical agroecosystems, where restoration can provide substantial socioecological benefits at relatively low costs, to demonstrate the actions being used successfully in practice. It also highlights cases where poorly designed restoration has been damaging.

The researchers say that, to successfully restore tropical agroecosystems and maximise benefits, initiatives must begin by considering ‘who’ should be involved in and benefit from restoration, and ‘what’, ‘where’, and ‘how’ restoration should occur.

The nine actions are:

  • Involve a diverse network of stakeholders at all stages and in all parts of restoration initiatives
  • Consider the economic benefits and costs of restoration
  • Collect more baseline data from observational studies
  • Inform algorithms to better identify restoration priority areas
  • Implement large-scale, long-term experiments to test restoration strategies
  • Increase study of additional biomes and regions
  • Include traditional ecological knowledge and local farming practices in restoration initiatives
  • Develop techniques to assess and improve restoration over time
  • Share results and data openly and widely.

While the researchers state that the actions are only a starting point for change and recognise that there are individual circumstances that will affect restoration in different regions, they say now is the time to take action. They state: “The current UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration offers unprecedented attention, research funding, and capacity to support restoration initiatives, aiming to inspire a large-scale, cross-cultural movement for global ecological restoration.”

*Picture credit: Neil Palmer/CIAT – Flickr, CC BY-SA 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=28394015

Latest News

Inclusive conservation

Rohini Chaturvedi finished her PhD at a difficult time for many students – in the midst of the global economic crisis of the early 2010s. But through a combination of hard work, initiative and serendipity she has found an impressive way to extend the work she did at Cambridge to promote conservation efforts in India. […]

Research impact award for Gates Cambridge Scholar

A Gates Cambridge Scholar is one of two winners of the 2023 Sandra Dawson Research Impact Award for his work on the economics of climate change earlier this month. The annual award was established through a generous donation from Professor Dame Sandra Dawson, a former Director of Cambridge’s Judge Business School. Winners are chosen based […]

AI system self-organises to resemble brains of complex organisms

A team of Cambridge scientists, co-led by a Gates Cambridge Scholar, have shown that placing physical constraints on an artificially-intelligent system – in much the same way that the human brain has to develop and operate within physical and biological constraints – allows it to develop features of the brains of complex organisms in order […]

Scholar wins history of science & medicine essay prize

A Gates Cambridge Scholar has won a prestigious essay competition about the history of early science with a treatise on evidence of knowledge exchange between the Ming-Chinese and Iberian conventions in the 16th century. The essay competition was run by the Early Sciences Forum of the History of Science Society and the Early Science and Medicine journal […]