Treating countries like businesses

  • November 7, 2013

Todd Tucker will be speaking about the power of arbitrators at a conference this week on international investment arbitration.

Arbitrators in international investment cases play a huge role in creating law and steering state behaviour, according to research by a Gates Cambridge Scholar which will be presented at an international conference this week.

Todd Tucker will be presenting his research on International Investment Arbitration at a World Trade Institute conference in Bern on Friday.

It shows that, unlike in other settings  where judges help interpret and institutionalise legal concepts initially set in motion by politicians and intellectuals, investment arbitrators help generate it from the start.

IIA is a treaty-like instrument between two or more nations that marries substantive investor protections with the procedural right of investors of one party to sue the government of one of the other parties.

Tucker’s paper seeks to establish what norms arbitrators create about states and how. It shows arbitrators both in tribunals that rule against and in favour of states use a mix of assertive ‘stating’ and relative ‘positioning’ modes and of ‘affirming’ and ‘disciplinary’ tenors when creating norms about states. In fact, Tucker says tribunals that sided with states appeared drawn to states that behaved more like private companies.

His analysis demonstrates that investment merit awards contain competing notions of strong and constrained states, and that arbitrators may be helping create a discourse that normalises greater state restraint and that favours states which act more like businesses than states.

Tucker [2012], who is doing a PhD in Development Studies, said: “When executive branch officials get sued in their own courts, they defend the case in front of judges that are officials of the same system of government. These judges defer to their executive branch officials, who tend to win many more cases than they lose. In contrast, investment arbitrators stand outside of the state system altogether. While governments still win slightly more arbitration cases than they lose, investment arbitrators’ language shows that they are willing and able to pass harsh judgment on government actions in a way that we’re less likely to see at the domestic level.”

 

Latest News

New book investigates history of US Patriot movement

A Gates Cambridge Scholar is preparing to publish her first book which examines the British political origins of the Patriot movement that inspired the American Revolution. Patriots Before Revolution: The […]

How do we encourage enterprise for the common good?

Three Scholars discuss how to encourage enterprise for the common good in the latest episode of the Gates Cambridge podcast, So, now what? Sandile Mtetwa [2017], Paolo Savaget [2015] and […]

A new AI tool to address educational inequality

A Gates Cambridge Scholar and his friend have created a new AI tool for teachers and students which aims to address education inequality and give teachers more time to teach. […]

Scholar organises drugs education exhibition

A Gates Cambridge Scholar is organising an exhibition in Cambridge which aims to expand drug education to include a greater focus on the history and politics of drugs and drug […]